This case is disturbing, as it goes way overboard in defining medical malpractice.<\/p>\n
There is genuine medical malpractice, and then there is questionable medical malpractice. The key to defining this lies in what the definition is or should be. This story is disturbing, as it goes too far overboard and leaves one wondering what one earth people will sue over next.<\/p>\n
Evidently, a Christian doctor has been severely reprimanded for sharing his beliefs with a patient. The warning will be put on his record for five years. Five years for sharing a belief in God with a patient? While it seems too off-the-wall to possibly be true, it is true.<\/p>\n
Apparently the committee investigating the complaint found that the doctor\u2019s actions did not meet the standards required by a doctor, which begs the question, \u201cJust what standards are required by a doctor?\u201d That he or she be a card carrying atheist, shun religion and (more…)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This case is disturbing, as it goes way overboard in defining medical malpractice. There is genuine medical malpractice, and then there is questionable medical malpractice. The key to defining this lies in what the definition is or should be. This…<\/span><\/p>\n