It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if you cap medical malpractice damages, the victim is hurt twice.<\/p>\n
Americans have been discussing the tort reform debate for a number of years, and, as always, it is a debate that infuriates many. There are those in favor of tort reform and those against it. The main thing is this \u2013 if you are involved in a personal injury case that leaves you with catastrophic injuries and you need medical care for the rest of your life, you suddenly understand how important it is that damages are not capped. In other words, if you expect to be able to pay for your care, you better hope the state you live in does not have a medical malpractice cap.<\/p>\n
Is this a simple issue? No. Is it an issue that is unfair to the victims of medical malpractice? Yes. Victims of medical (more…)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if you cap medical malpractice damages, the victim is hurt twice. Americans have been discussing the tort reform debate for a number of years, and, as always, it is…<\/span><\/p>\n