Trademark infighting is somewhat amusing to watch. However, there is often a subtle message in these head games.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s rather amusing in a way to watch the squabbling going on over various trademarks and who has the right to use them. Not that there isn\u2019t some validity in the whole process, but it seems it has been diluted by the petty infighting one sees today,\u201d said David Alden Erikson, a Los Angeles business litigation attorney<\/a>. Mr. Erikson specializes in Los Angeles fashion law<\/a>, Internet law<\/a>, business litigation<\/a>, trademark and copyright law<\/a>.<\/p>\n One first class example of a trademark spat involves the Facebook game company, Zynga. They have made it their mission to get a cease and desist order issued against game creators, Blingville, LLC. The Blingville game is in beta stage development at the moment. And the cease and desist order? Well, this may seem a bit ridiculous, but the order claims that (more…)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Trademark infighting is somewhat amusing to watch. However, there is often a subtle message in these head games. \u201cIt\u2019s rather amusing in a way to watch the squabbling going on over various trademarks and who has the right to use…<\/span><\/p>\n