It’s not rocket science, although one might wonder when faced with some of the latest breathalyzers on the market. The fancier they get, the more legal challenges they generate.<\/p>\n
Law enforcement loves breathalyzers for what secrets they tell about a driver suspected of operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol. The problem lately is that some of the newer models being used in the field \u2013 the Intoxilyzer 5000 and Intoxilyzer 8000 \u2013 are being fought tooth and nail by attorneys because of the admissibility of the results.<\/p>\n
It seems the major problem is that the company that makes these interesting machines isn’t in any mood to share their source code. While this may be just a company protecting its technology and the right to protect its patent, etc., it is also a major stumbling block with DUI attorneys who are rightfully pointing out that their clients can’t get a fair trial (more…)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" It’s not rocket science, although one might wonder when faced with some of the latest breathalyzers on the market. The fancier they get, the more legal challenges they generate. Law enforcement loves breathalyzers for what secrets they tell about a…<\/span><\/p>\n