![\"slip-hazard-1429630-m\"](\"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/7ce7454b74_slip-hazard-1429630-m.jpg\")
<\/a> has identified two elements that a plaintiff must plead and prove in order to bring a viable slip and fall claim: 1) that the defendant had either actual or constructive knowledge of the hazard; and 2) the plaintiff, despite exercising ordinary care, had no knowledge of the hazard due to the defendant\u2019s actions or to conditions under the defendant\u2019s control. While the basic concept of liability may seem straightforward, the particular facts of each case will determine the ultimate outcome.\u00a0 An experienced Atlanta premises liability attorney will be able to quickly identify the critical components of your case to determine eligibility for compensation.<\/p>\nIn a recent case, Kroger Company v. Schoenhoff<\/a><\/em>, Ga. Ct. App. (2013), Steve and Melanie Schoenhoff (the \u201cplaintiffs\u201d) filed a personal injury and loss of consortium (more…)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Many premises liability causes of action are based on a plaintiff\u2019s \u201cslip and fall\u201d or \u201ctrip and fall\u201d claim. The Georgia Supreme Court has identified two elements that a plaintiff must plead and prove in order to bring a viable…<\/span><\/p>\n