Sometimes when car accidents occur, they are the result of a third party’s negligence, who was not actually involved in the collision.<\/p>\n
In one such case,\u00a0Wolfe v. Carter<\/em>, 726 SE 2d 122, Ga. Ct. App. \u00a0(2012)<\/a>,\u00a0a man suffered injuries when he became sandwiched <\/a>between two tractor trailer trucks, when an unidentified driver made a u-turn across the highway. Apparently, the visibility on that day was very poor, due to some thick fog-like smoke. The drivers of the vehicles and law enforcement officials reported an inability to see more than 20-30 feet ahead due to the conditions.<\/p>\n An officer that responded to the collision believed that a fire must have caused the smoke, and thus contacted the Forestry Commission, and learned that only one person, the defendant in this action, had conducted a controlled burn in the area. The officer did not know whether the smoke on the roadway was caused by the controlled (more…)<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Sometimes when car accidents occur, they are the result of a third party’s negligence, who was not actually involved in the collision. In one such case,\u00a0Wolfe v. Carter, 726 SE 2d 122, Ga. Ct. App. \u00a0(2012),\u00a0a man suffered injuries when…<\/span><\/p>\n