Warning: Declaration of AVH_Walker_Category_Checklist::walk($elements, $max_depth) should be compatible with Walker::walk($elements, $max_depth, ...$args) in /home/seonews/public_html/wp-content/plugins/extended-categories-widget/4.2/class/avh-ec.widgets.php on line 62
{"id":12052,"date":"2011-12-16T20:06:47","date_gmt":"2011-12-16T20:06:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/2011\/12\/social-security-ruling-11-1p-new-application-2\/"},"modified":"2011-12-16T20:06:47","modified_gmt":"2011-12-16T20:06:47","slug":"social-security-ruling-11-1p-new-application-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/2011\/12\/social-security-ruling-11-1p-new-application-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Social Security Ruling 11-1p: New Application"},"content":{"rendered":"

In essence SSR-11-1p limits claimants after receiving an Unfavorable ALJ Hearing Decision or in some circumstances a Partially Favorable ALJ Hearing Decision to decide an Appeals Council action\u00a0OR submit a “new”\/”subsequent” application. In the past you could do both without restrictions. SSR-11-1p dramatically changed a claimant’s choice.<\/p>\n

SSA is still digesting and issuing the procedures around SSR-11-1p. Recently, SSA Office of Appellate Operations Executive Director Judge Patricia Jonas has implemented a policy change where a claimant may be able to file a “new”\/”subsequent” application\u00a0if there is an allegation of a “new critical or disabling condition” with an onset date AFTER the date of the hearing decision. Such requests are suppose to be processed within in 2 days.<\/p>\n

However, what defines a “new critical or disabling condition” AFTER the onset date remains to be seen. There has not been any data that suggests a 2 day response time has been effectively followed.<\/p>\n

SSR-11-1p implementation\u00a0is just (more…)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In essence SSR-11-1p limits claimants after receiving an Unfavorable ALJ Hearing Decision or in some circumstances a Partially Favorable ALJ Hearing Decision to decide an Appeals Council action\u00a0OR submit a “new”\/”subsequent” application. In the past you could do both without…<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more ›<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"1","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[283],"tags":[2096,786,2095],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12052"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12052\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.seonewswire.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Deprecated: Directive 'allow_url_include' is deprecated in Unknown on line 0