Warning: Declaration of AVH_Walker_Category_Checklist::walk($elements, $max_depth) should be compatible with Walker::walk($elements, $max_depth, ...$args) in /home/seonews/public_html/wp-content/plugins/extended-categories-widget/4.2/class/avh-ec.widgets.php on line 62
Superior Court | SEONewsWire.net http://www.seonewswire.net Search Engine Optimized News for Business Fri, 07 Oct 2016 16:44:42 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.8 Lien Resolution In Personal Injury Cases http://www.seonewswire.net/2016/10/lien-resolution-in-personal-injury-cases-3/ Fri, 07 Oct 2016 16:44:42 +0000 http://www.seonewswire.net/2016/10/lien-resolution-in-personal-injury-cases-3/ This is the third in a series of articles dealing with lien resolution in personal injury cases. Welfare Liens In New Jersey, there is a lien against real and personal property of a person who has been assisted by or received support from any

The post Lien Resolution In Personal Injury Cases first appeared on SEONewsWire.net.]]>

This is the third in a series of articles dealing with lien resolution in personal injury cases.

Welfare Liens

In New Jersey, there is a lien against real and personal property of a person who has been assisted by or received support from any municipality or county. This is true whether a person has been in a county facility or at home.1

Mental Health Liens

In New Jersey. a person with a mental illness who is over age 18 and is being treated in a state psychiatric hospital shall be liable for the full cost of his treatment. maintenance. and all necessary related expenses.2 Although this statute does include a repayment obligation. it does not appear to impose a lien. particularly with respect to personal injury claims.

Traumatic Brain Injury Fund

Tbe New Jersey Traumatic Brain Injury Fund is the payer of last resort for costs of post-acute care. services. and financial assistance provided to survivors of traumatic brain injury. particularly with respect to rehabilitative and long-term care needs not covered by private insurance or public benefits programs. 3 The fund provides up Lo $15,000 a year in benefits, not to exceed a total expenditure of $100,000 per eligible person. The fund has a first-priority claim to any monies received by the person with traumatic brain injury as the result of a settlement or other payment made in connection with the traumatic brain injury.4

Catastrophic Illness in Children Relief Fund

As its name suggests, the Catastrophic Illness in Children Relief Fund is a New Jersey program that provides assistance to children and their families whose medical expenses extend beyond tbe families’ available resources. 5 In the case of an illness or condition for which the family. after receiving fund assistance. recovers damages for the child’s medical expenses pursuant to a settlement or judgment in a legal action, the family is required to reimburse the fund for the amount of assistance received. or for the portion of assistance covered by the amount of the damages. subject to a credit for the expenses of obtaining the recovery.6 The Fund administrators have the authority to negotiate settlement of its reimbursement claims.; Victims of Crime Compensation In New Jersey. certain victims of crime are entitled to compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act of 19 71. 8 The Act covers individuals injured or killed by any act or omission of any other person, which is within the description of offenses listed within the Act.9 The state has a right of subrogation against the person responsible for personal injury or death. and a lien after entry of judgment.10 State Worlrnrs’ Compensation Claims \•\/hen there is a state Workers’ Compensation (WC) claim and also a third party liability case. and the third-party liability case settles, there is a WC lien against the third-party liability proceeds.11  Frequently. the WC lien is negotiable. because the WC carrier may be motivated to get the plaintiff off its books.

If the amount recovered from the third party is greater than the WC lien, no attorneys’ fees or costs are permitted. If the sum recovered against the third party is less than the WC lien, there is a pro rata reduction for attorneys· fees and costs.12  Expenses shall not exceed $ 750 and attorneys’ fees shall not exceed 33-1/ 3 %. 13

Federal Employee Compensation Act The Federal Employee Compensation Act (FECA) is the federal equivalent of the state Workers’ Compensation law. 14  The United States has a statutory lien for recovery against the third party liability case.15  The lien attaches to the entire recovery.

Hospital Liens

Generally, every hospital, nursing home, licensed physician or dentist may assert a lien for services rendered by way of treatment, care, or maintenance to any person who has sustained personal injuries in an accident as a result of negligence or alleged negligence of any other person.16 The lien attaches to the proceeds of any settlement, award. or judgment an injured person may obtain from a third party as a result of the injuries for which services were provided.17  Hospital liens may be difficult to negotiate: however, such liens are subject to strict filing and notice requirements 18 and failure to comply with the statute is fatal to the lien claim.

Child Support

New Jersey imposes liens for child support against any proceeds recovered from a personal injury settlement.19  The lien shall have priority over all other levies and garnishments against the net proceeds of any settlement, judgment, or award, unless otherwise provided by the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Family Part. The only exception is unpaid income taxes.

Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD)

The Division of Developmental Disabilities asserts liens for many of its programs. Before settling a case, it is important to check with DOD if plaintiff has been receiving those services.

 

1 N.J.S.A. 4:4-91.

2 N.J.S.A. 30:4-60(c)(1).

3 N.J.S.A. 30:6F-1 et seq.

4 N.J.S.A. 30:6F-6(b).

5 N.J.S.A. 26:2-148 et seq.

6 N.J.S.A. 26:2-154(b).

7 N.J.S.A. 26:2-154.1.

8 N.J.S.A. 52:4B-1.

9 N.J.S.A. 52:4B-10.

10 N.J.S.A. 52:4B-20.

11 N.J.S.A. 34:15-40.

12 N.J.S.A. 34:15-40(b) and (c)

13 N.J.S.A. 34:15-40(e)

14 5 U.S.C. §8131 and 8132:20 C.F.R. § 10.705-719.

15 5 U.S.C. §8132.

16 N.J.S.A. 2A:44-36.

17 N.J.S.A. 2A:44-37.

18 N.J.S.A. 2A:44-41.

17 N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(b).

The post Lien Resolution In Personal Injury Cases first appeared on SEONewsWire.net.]]>
Texting With a Driver? You Could be Liable. http://www.seonewswire.net/2016/05/texting-with-a-driver-you-could-be-liable/ Mon, 23 May 2016 14:03:27 +0000 http://www.seonewswire.net/2016/05/texting-with-a-driver-you-could-be-liable/ We know that when drivers text, they are distracted. Distraction is a major catalyst for auto accidents. Motorists who cause crashes will be held liable to compensate for any resulting injuries. They may, depending on state law, even face criminal sanctions. But

The post Texting With a Driver? You Could be Liable. first appeared on SEONewsWire.net.]]>
We know that when drivers text, they are distracted. Distraction is a major catalyst for auto accidents. Motorists who cause crashes will be held liable to compensate for any resulting injuries. They may, depending on state law, even face criminal sanctions.phone1

But a new legal trend is emerging, one that involves the responsibility of those communicating on the other end. In a number of instances in different states, third parties that knowingly engage in text communication with drivers – or encourage drivers to engage in distracting activities – are being named as defendants in personal injury lawsuits. Success on this front has been varied, but it’s something our Miami car accident attorneys believe is worth exploring when there is evidence the crash was caused by distraction.

A recent article on Vocativ explored this burgeoning legal realm.

Let’s look at the recent case of Gallatin v. Gargiuloand the decision handed down by a Pennsylvania county common pleas court judge. According to court records, decedent/ motorcyclist was slowing down to make a right turn when at the same time, a woman was operating a vehicle owned by defendant. She was behind the decedent motorcyclist at the time. It is alleged that the female driver was text messaging on her cell phone at the time of the crash, in violation of state law, and that she as inattentive and distracted, causing her to strike the motorcycle ahead of her, resulting in decedent’s fatal injuries. The complaint alleges that the female driver was texting at the time with her boyfriend/ owner of the car. Plaintiff, administrator of decedent’s estate, then sued not only the driver, but also the vehicle owner – not for vicariously liability by way of his ownership of the car, but for direct negligence for knowingly texting with someone while they were driving.

The judge noted there was no precedent in Pennsylvania that specifically spells out the duties or liability of a sender of a text message to a person who is driving. However, it took note of a ruling by the Superior Court of New Jersey in Kubert v. Best. In that case, the New Jersey court held the sender of a text message could be potentially liable if a car accident is caused by texting, but only if the sender knew or had special reason to know the recipient would view the text while driving and therefore be distracted. In Gallatin, plaintiff alleged defendant knew or should have known his girlfriend with whom he was texting was driving her vehicle and was therefore distracted. The assertion was that the actions of defendant aided or encouraged the driver to be distracted and thus provided a basis for establishing liability.

The court noted that while all plaintiff’s assertions had not yet been proven, if they were true, they could serve as the basis for establishing liability, based on the ruling in Kubert.

More recently, a Georgia man filed a lawsuit against Snapchat for “encouraging” motorists to drive distracted with creation of an app that captures one’s speed and superimposes the that recording on an image.

If you have been a victim of distracted driving, we can help.

If you have been a victim of a traffic accident, call Chalik & Chalik at (954) 476-1000 or 1 (800) 873-9040.

Additional Resources:

Texting a Person While They’re Driving Could Land You in Jail, May 3, 2016, By Jennings Brown, Vocativ

More Blog Entries:

Car Accident Lawsuit Names Snapchat as Defendant, May 3, 2016, Miami Car Accident Lawyer Blog

The post Texting With a Driver? You Could be Liable. first appeared on SEONewsWire.net.]]>
RESOLVING HOSPITAL, CHILD SUPPORT AND DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES LIENS IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES http://www.seonewswire.net/2015/11/resolving-hospital-child-support-and-division-of-developmental-disabilities-liens-in-personal-injury-cases/ Mon, 09 Nov 2015 15:29:01 +0000 http://www.seonewswire.net/2015/11/resolving-hospital-child-support-and-division-of-developmental-disabilities-liens-in-personal-injury-cases/ by Thomas D. Begley, Jr., CELA   Hospital Liens Generally, every hospital, nursing home, licensed physician, or dentist may assert a lien for services rendered by way of treatment, care, or maintenance to any person who has sustained personal injuries

The post RESOLVING HOSPITAL, CHILD SUPPORT AND DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES LIENS IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES first appeared on SEONewsWire.net.]]>

by Thomas D. Begley, Jr., CELA

 

Hospital Liens

Generally, every hospital, nursing home, licensed physician, or dentist may assert a lien for services rendered by way of treatment, care, or maintenance to any person who has sustained personal injuries in an accident as a result of negligence or alleged negligence of any other person.[1] The lien attaches to the proceeds of any settlement, award, or judgment an injured person may obtain from a third party as a result of the injuries for which services were provided.[2] Hospital liens may be difficult to negotiate; however, such liens are subject to strict filing and notice requirements[3] and failure to comply with the statute is fatal to the lien claim.

 

Child Support

New Jersey imposes liens for child support against any proceeds recovered from a personal injury settlement.[4] The lien shall have priority over all other levies and garnishments against the net proceeds of any settlement, judgment, or award, unless otherwise provided by the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Family Part. The only exception is unpaid income taxes.

 

Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD)

The Division of Developmental Disabilities asserts liens for many of its programs. Before settling a case, it is important to check with DDD if plaintiff has been receiving those services.

 

[1] N.J.S.A. 2A:44-36.

[2] N.J.S.A. 2A:44-37.

[3] N.J.S.A. 2A:44-41.

[4] N.J.A.C. 2A:17-56.23(b).

The post RESOLVING HOSPITAL, CHILD SUPPORT AND DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES LIENS IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES first appeared on SEONewsWire.net.]]>

Deprecated: Directive 'allow_url_include' is deprecated in Unknown on line 0