Warning: Declaration of AVH_Walker_Category_Checklist::walk($elements, $max_depth) should be compatible with Walker::walk($elements, $max_depth, ...$args) in /home/seonews/public_html/wp-content/plugins/extended-categories-widget/4.2/class/avh-ec.widgets.php on line 62
Judge Ojeda | SEONewsWire.net http://www.seonewswire.net Search Engine Optimized News for Business Sat, 08 Jun 2013 17:54:35 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.8 Judge Fegers rules the $5,250.00 "civil penalty" on Polk prostitution cases can not be applied retroactively to offenses that occurred prior to January 1, 2013. http://www.seonewswire.net/2013/06/judge-fegers-rules-the-5250-00-civil-penalty-on-polk-prostitution-cases-can-not-be-applied-retroactively-to-offenses-that-occurred-prior-to-january-1-2013/ Sat, 08 Jun 2013 17:54:35 +0000 http://www.seonewswire.net/2013/06/judge-fegers-rules-the-5250-00-civil-penalty-on-polk-prostitution-cases-can-not-be-applied-retroactively-to-offenses-that-occurred-prior-to-january-1-2013/ This week, Polk county criminal court Judge Fegers rules that the “civil penalty” in prostitution case can not be applied retroactively.  This means that if you were arrested before January 1, 2013 before the$5,250.00 fine went into effect,  you will

The post Judge Fegers rules the $5,250.00 "civil penalty" on Polk prostitution cases can not be applied retroactively to offenses that occurred prior to January 1, 2013. first appeared on SEONewsWire.net.]]>
This week, Polk county criminal court Judge Fegers rules that the “civil penalty” in prostitution case can not be applied retroactively.  This means that if you were arrested before January 1, 2013 before the$5,250.00 fine went into effect,  you will NOT have to pay the fine.

This is due to the fact that our Florida and United States Constitution protect citizens from “Ex Post Facto” laws.  Judge Fegers ruled that the legislature did not intend the statute to be applied retroactively which ended the matter.  However, because the judge did s thorough job, he also analyzed the civil penalty under the “ex post facto doctrine”.  This doctrine protects against laws that increase a penalty for the criminal offense AFTER the crime has been committed.  The issue in essence was whether when a suspect is charged with violating Florida Statute 796.07(2)(f), the “civil penalty” is a punishment or a “civil remedy” that would not be subject to ex post facto analysis.

Judge Fegers order found that because of the language used in the statute (the word “penalty”), the amount of the penalty, and the imposition of the penalty as to specifically prescribed conduct constituting a specific criminal offense, that the $5,000.00 is a fine and a “penalty” and not a “cost”.  This means that the court will not impose the “civil penalty” in excess of $500.00 for violations of Florida Statute 796.07(2)(f) for offenses that occurred prior to the change in the prostitution statute.  The “civil penalty” was previously $500.00 for “johns” only.

This motion was filed on the limited basis of increasing the fine in cases where “johns” arrested before January 1 for those that did not resolve their cases quickly.  I am still waiting for a ruling from Judge Ojeda as to whether the statute is constitutional on a number of other challenges and grounds.  This ruling is expected within the next couple of weeks and will apply to prostitution offense committed after January 1, 2013.  Judge Fegers ruling helps my motion because he has now declared the $5,000.00 fine a “penalty” which is a key argument in my motion.  Attorney Larry Shearer did an excellent job writing the “Ex Post Facto” motion and arguing it to get this result.

If you have been charged with prostitution or any other crime, call an speak to an aggressive lawyer that will fight for you!

CALL AND SET YOUR FREE OFFICE CONSULTATION NOW! 

You will not have to drive to another county. Office – Lakeland, Polk County.

Thomas C. Grajek  863-688-4606

 

Handling all felony and misdemeanor criminal cases in Polk County, Florida.

The post Judge Fegers rules the $5,250.00 "civil penalty" on Polk prostitution cases can not be applied retroactively to offenses that occurred prior to January 1, 2013. first appeared on SEONewsWire.net.]]>
Update on Motion to Declare $5,250.00 "civil penalty" unconstitutional in Polk prostitution sting operation filed by Polk criminal lawyer Thomas C. Grajek. http://www.seonewswire.net/2013/06/update-on-motion-to-declare-5250-00-civil-penalty-unconstitutional-in-polk-prostitution-sting-operation-filed-by-polk-criminal-lawyer-thomas-c-grajek/ Sun, 02 Jun 2013 15:27:52 +0000 http://www.seonewswire.net/2013/06/update-on-motion-to-declare-5250-00-civil-penalty-unconstitutional-in-polk-prostitution-sting-operation-filed-by-polk-criminal-lawyer-thomas-c-grajek/ Many people are asking what is the status of the Motion to Declare the Prostitution “civil penalty” unconstitutional that I filed a couple of months ago.  Many Polk criminal defense attorneys taking these prostitution cases are not filing a motion

The post Update on Motion to Declare $5,250.00 "civil penalty" unconstitutional in Polk prostitution sting operation filed by Polk criminal lawyer Thomas C. Grajek. first appeared on SEONewsWire.net.]]>
Many people are asking what is the status of the Motion to Declare the Prostitution “civil penalty” unconstitutional that I filed a couple of months ago.  Many Polk criminal defense attorneys taking these prostitution cases are not filing a motion or fighting the $5,250.00 civil penalty.  Some lawyers are waiting for the ruling on my motion, but did not assist me or file a motion in their client’s case.  There are a couple of attorneys who have filed a motion and I will gladly give you the names of those that are willing to fight for their clients.  Who do you want to be in court fighting for you? The attorney doing the work or the lawyer that says just pay the fine or let another attorney do the work?  As a reminder, some people arrested in the latest sting operation have their Arraignment court date this Thursday.

On Friday, I was in court scheduled to argue the motion before Judge Kirkland.  We are still waiting for a ruling from Judge Ojeda from when I first filed the motion.  The motion before Judge Kirkland also included an objection to the outrageous penalty on the basis of “es post facto” law.  that means that you can not increase the penalties for a criminal offense, AFTER the criminal act allegedly occurred.  This part of the motion dealt with a defendant who had been arrested in the August 2012 Polk prostitution sting, but did not resolve his case before January 1, 2013, when the increased penalty went into effect.

I am expecting a ruling within the next two weeks.  At that time we will find out if the $5,250.00 civil penalty will be applied or declared unconstitutional.  Again, this penalty only applies to “johns” and not the prostitute, pimp, or even sexual predators.

If you are charged with a crime and want someone that will fight in court for you, your rights, and your reputation call

Polk Criminal Defense Attorney Thomas C. Grajek

863-688-4606

 

The post Update on Motion to Declare $5,250.00 "civil penalty" unconstitutional in Polk prostitution sting operation filed by Polk criminal lawyer Thomas C. Grajek. first appeared on SEONewsWire.net.]]>

Deprecated: Directive 'allow_url_include' is deprecated in Unknown on line 0