According to a new report by the Governors Highway Safety Association, the number of bicycle fatalities rose by 16 percent between 2010 and 2012. There were 621 bicycle deaths in 2010, 680 in 2011 and 722 in 2012.

The authors of the association’s report said that the increase in fatalities does not necessarily mean that bicycling is becoming more dangerous. It is more likely that the change is occurring because bicycling is simply becoming more popular. As more people use bicycles, the raw number of deaths has increased. It is difficult to measure whether bicycling is also becoming more dangerous in comparison, because there are no national statistics kept on the popularity of riding bicycles.

Still, bike safety advocates agree that even one death is too many, and that changes, like better bike lanes, are needed.

The problem is particularly severe in Florida. In Florida, 120 bicyclists were killed in 2012. Both in terms of raw numbers and as a percentage of the population, Florida has ranked as the deadliest state for bicycle riders in the country for many years. The state’s death rate for bicycle riders is three times higher than the national rate, and Tampa and Orlando are consistently ranked as the nation’s deadliest metropolitan areas for bicyclists.

If you need to speak with a personal injury lawyer, Call Joyce & Reyes at 1.888.771.1529 or visit more of http://www.joyceandreyespa.com/.

Supporters of the change said that an increase in the speed limit would be a boon for the trucking industry and would bring Illinois in line with nearby states, but opponents said that the change would result in more traffic fatalities.

According to Rep. C.D. Davidsmeyer, a Jacksonville Republican, some drivers traveling south from Chicago avoid driving through Illinois because the lower speed limit increases travel time. Davidsmeyer said this results in the state missing out on revenue from motorists’ gas and food purchases.

However, House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, a Chicago Democrat, said that both the state police and the Illinois Department of Transportation opposed the bill because the higher speed limit would endanger drivers’ lives. Rep. Deb Mell, also a Chicago Democrat, said that increasing the speed limit to 70 mph would not greatly reduce travel time.

Speeding was the cause of the majority of the 900 traffic fatalities in Illinois last year. Higher speed limits are opposed by the Governors Highway Safety Association, the American Automobile Association and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

The change would also come with the cost of replacing about 900 speed limit signs, which the state transportation department estimates will be about $200,000, including the cost of manufacturing the signs and the labor involved in replacing them.

Gov. Quinn’s office said that the bill will be carefully reviewed. The governor’s office had earlier said that there were safety concerns involved with the bill. However, the bill received broad support in both houses of the state legislature. In the Senate, the vote was 41-6 in favor of the proposed legislation, and 36 votes would be needed to override a veto. The House voted 85-30 in favor of the bill, with 71 votes necessary to override a veto in that chamber.

Thirty-four states have a maximum speed limit of 70 mph or higher, and Illinois is currently among 16 states with a 65 mph maximum. If the current bill becomes law, the change would take effect on January 1, 2014. Where interstate highways enter urban areas, the speed limit would continue to be lower, and the bill provides that six counties surrounding Chicago and two Illinois counties near St. Louis may keep all interstate speeds at 65 mph via local ordinance.

Paul Greenberg is a car accident lawyer in Chicago and car crash attorney with Briskman Briskman & Greenberg. To learn more call 1.877.595.4878 or visit http://www.briskmanandbriskman.com/.

Google+